Re: OPT == type 41?

[bmanning@ISI.EDU]

> At 04:35 PM 9/7/99 , Paul A Vixie wrote:
>> note that bind8.2.2, the first implementation which even knows the OPT
>> RTYPE, no longer treats (rtype<128) specially in any way.  unless there
>> are known defects in other (or older) implementations that would cause a
>> meta-RR having a type less than 128 to be a problem, i think we should
>> just leave this alone.
>
> No we should do this right, meta records SHOULD be grouped together.
> 
> 	Olafur 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Olafur Gudmundsson - NAI Labs 
> the Security Research Division of Network Associates, Inc.
> 3060 Wasthington Road, Rt 97, Glenwood MD 21738
> ogud@tislabs.com  Olafur_Gudmundsson@nai.com
> 443-259-2389 
> Private: ogud@acm.org

perhaps an update should be in order for this RFC. 

--bill