Re: draft-dunlap-dns-duxfr-00.txt

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Rob;

> Paul, Kevin,
> 
> In the introduction to draft-dunlap-dns-duxfr-00.txt you say:
> 
>    The simple method described for Incremental transfer (IXFR), in
>    [RFC1995], does not adequately address the complexity of the problem.
> 
> but do not further explain the motivation for DUXFR.  Perhaps I was
> drinking decaf this morning by mistake, but the complexity you're
> attempting to deal with is not immediately obvious.

The simple (?) method described for duxfr does not adequately
address the optional complexity of the problem to enable UDP
transfer.

> Care to elaborate?

It seems to me that the simple description style of duxfr is a
copy of ixfr, for which I should be proud of.

Can't Paul and Kevin elaborate to update the style of RFC2136,
instead?

						Masataka Ohta