Re: Status of RFC1611, RFC1612

[Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@tislabs.com>]

At 06:13 PM 10/6/00, Richard Johnson wrote:
>On the DNSEXT working group web page it mentions documents under
>consideration for advancement as:
>
>  DNS Server MIB Extensions RFC1611 Proposed
>
>  DNS Resolver MIB Extensions RFC1612 Proposed
>
>However, it then mentions under working group items as:
>
>  Retirement of DNS MIB's RFC's
>
>Since these RFCs are rather old, I'm guessing that the whole issue of
>a MIB for DNS is being dropped?  Just trying to make sure.
>
>/raj


The old RFC's have been demonstrated to be a bad fit for what is needed
and one implementation specific.
The working group has agreed to drop them from the standards process,
the WG is willing to entertain replacement MIB proposals.

         Olafur (the WG co-chair).

PS: my personal guess is that each vendor will create his own MIB.




to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.