[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-apl-rr-01.txt



Patrik Fältström said:
> To continue that discussion, I basically don't understand why you
> have to add code to generic DNS software just because you add an RR.
> ...
> It's all length-prefixed blocks of bits.

Because of domain name compression.  An RR containing compressed names
will be silently corrupted if it is transmitted as a mere block of
bits.  There is also a couple of other issues like the downcasing of
embedded domain names currently required for DNSSEC canonicalization.

draft-ietf-dnsext-unknown-rrs-00.txt is an attempt to address this.
-- 
Andreas Gustafsson, gson@nominum.com


to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.