[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-apl-rr-01.txt
- To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Subject: Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-apl-rr-01.txt
- From: gson@nominum.com (Andreas Gustafsson)
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 22:28:15 -0800
- Cc: namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
- Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 22:31:48 -0800
- Envelope-to: namedroppers-data@psg.com
Patrik Fältström said:
> To continue that discussion, I basically don't understand why you
> have to add code to generic DNS software just because you add an RR.
> ...
> It's all length-prefixed blocks of bits.
Because of domain name compression. An RR containing compressed names
will be silently corrupted if it is transmitted as a mere block of
bits. There is also a couple of other issues like the downcasing of
embedded domain names currently required for DNSSEC canonicalization.
draft-ietf-dnsext-unknown-rrs-00.txt is an attempt to address this.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, gson@nominum.com
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.