[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on delegation-signer-08

On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Marcos Sanz/Denic wrote:

> Section 2.6.1,
>
> It says:
> "Secure DS: NS + DS + SIG(DS)"
>
> Shouldn't it say?
> "Secure DS: NS + DS + SIG(DS) + NXT + SIG(NXT)"

The resolver can determine by an "NS + DS + SIG(DS)" response that this is
a delegation to a secured zone. Though in the parent zone there resides a
"+ NXT + SIG(NXT)", this section documents how a resolver determines the
type of delegation.

Regards,

Roy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>