Re: DNSSEXT Yokohama Minutes

[Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>]

kre wrote:

>   | 	Answers returned from the child servers will be rejected by todays
>   | 	servers as lame as the generated NS records will not match those
>   | 	returned from the child zone without re-defining * to be a single
>   | 	label for NS.
> 
> Huh?   Since when does anyone (registries doing delegations excepted, or
> some of them...) actually go comparing the server names in NS records.

the more important part might be the actual owner of that NS RR identifying
the zone's apex. For the server names in RDATA, you're right - that would
be fun - not. But then, I'd not call delegations failing these validity
checks `lame'.

-Peter

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>