[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: private algorithms and the DS record

To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: private algorithms and the DS record
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:45:21 +0000
In-reply-to: Message from Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> of "Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:25:43 EST." <6.2.0.14.2.20041231011944.04660258@localhost>

> I see #5
> 5) Remove special handling of Private Key's in RRSIG, i.e. do the same
> thing as in DS and cementing Private algorithm's second class status.

i agree.

> Personally I think 2 is the most appropriate approach if this is
> big enough a issue to warrant the attention of the working group.

though i prefer #5, i agree that #2 is the right fallback choice.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- Re: private algorithms and the DS record
  - From: Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>

Prev by Date: Re: private algorithms and the DS record
Previous by thread: Re: private algorithms and the DS record
Next by thread: DNSSEC and unknown algorithms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread