Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis

[bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:32:30PM +0100, Geoffrey Sisson wrote:
> Rob Austein <sra@isc.org> writes:
> 
> > I propose that we just leave this broken stuff broken.
> 
> If so, would it be desirable to change -wcard-clarify (I'm guessing it
> would stay "-clarify") to explicitly state that the behaviour for
> "* DNAME" and "* NS" is undefined?  I'm trying to see this from the
> viewpoint of an implementor, who may have difficulty reading between
> the lines of the current language.
> 
> Geoff

	and unlike Rob, i'd like to see these things defined.
	defined as -undefined- (explicitly) at this time, or
	taking a crack at what should happen when these are seen
	in a zone.  Leaving things underspecified is distasteful.

--bill

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>