[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Type Code 31

To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: Type Code 31
From: Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie >
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:39:45 +0100
Cc: Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie >, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <a06200700be6bebef1722@[192.168.1.100]>
References: <a06200704be69d343f94e@[10.31.33.65]> <20050327011156.GA21947@vacation.karoshi.com> <a06200700be6bebef1722@[192.168.1.100]>


On 27 Mar 2005, at 05:51, Edward Lewis wrote:

On the one hand, having a historical record is good - what killed a record is worth remembering.

The historical record also protects against collision with instances which may be 'undead' and lurking in the wild.

On the other hand, let's not clutter up implementations with unnecessary code paths.


Indeed.

/Niall

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- Type Code 31
  - From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Type Code 31
  - From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>

Prev by Date: Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
Next by Date: Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
Previous by thread: Re: Type Code 31
Next by thread: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread