[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis

To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
From: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:37:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <a06200700be6f5083c205@[10.31.32.83]>
References: <200503291826.j2TIQ0o03847@zeder.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <a06200700be6f5083c205@10.31.32.83>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:57:25 -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
> 
> How about we document that there are inconsistencies in the 
> definition of DNS which lead to unclear semantics when asterisk 
> labels are delegation points or DNAME rewrite points.  In the spirit 
> of their being inconsistencies, i.e., no right and wrong, no best 
> current practice, we declare that we are not going to delineate rules 
> at this time.

Ok with me.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
  - From: Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
- Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
  - From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>

Prev by Date: Re: Draft DNSEXT @ IETF62 Minutes
Next by Date: Re: NSEC3-01 - more wildcard nits
Previous by thread: Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
Next by thread: Re: wcard discussions in Minneapolis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread