[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSEC3-01 - more wildcard nits

To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: NSEC3-01 - more wildcard nits
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:09:23 +0100
Cc: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <a06200701be71b1c2770c@[192.168.1.101]>
References: <E0F9A660CB9FFCD1251D2C2E@[192.168.100.25]> <a06200701be71b1c2770c@[192.168.1.101]>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Edward Lewis wrote:

PS I still have my doubts about finding a successor to NSEC. A flag day would be needed to erase existing NSEC from the DNS and be seamless. Even if the thought is that "NSEC-era" verifiers will be upgraded to overcome this, that's the flag day.


Remember that the plan does not include erasing NSEC.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- NSEC3-01 - more wildcard nits
  - From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: NSEC3-01 - more wildcard nits
  - From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>

Prev by Date: Re: NSEC3-01 - more wildcard nits
Next by Date: Re: Two more NSEC++ proposals
Previous by thread: Re: NSEC3-01 - more wildcard nits
Next by thread: Two more NSEC++ proposals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread