[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Two more NSEC++ proposals

Edward Lewis wrote: 
At 16:14 -0500 3/31/05, Samuel Weiler wrote:

Proposal 1:

   One could also create a delegation within the zone to keep these
   names in one place:


It is not wise to propose a new TLD in a protocol document. 

What TLD? None was proposed that I can see.

Proposal 2: 


   The authoritative server keeps a table of these and selects the
   right one, along with its RRSIG, whenever needed.


This is broken on so many levels. For one, database coherency. 

Why?

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>