RE: Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-01.txt

["Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>]

One minor typo:

Section 3, second para:

"This behavior SHOULD by the default."

/by/be/

I've read this version, and I don't have any objections about going forward
with this version.  Sorry about not stating earlier.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Wes Hardaker
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:03 PM
> To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-01.txt
>
>
>
> I published the latest copy of the -ds draft a week ago or so (the
> announcement was sent to this list as well).  I'm now interested if
> there are any outstanding issues with the draft.  In particular,
> please review sections 3 and 4 which are the sections that changed the
> most based on feedback from the working group.
>
> In order for this document to go forward, it needs do be reviewed by
> at least 5 people (per recent discussion at the last IETF and on the
> list).  The WG chairs would like acks at least from 5 people that have
> read the draft.
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> Sparta, Inc.
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>