Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis

[Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>]

In light of the new WG requirement that every document the working
group advances there must be a set of WG members on record that they
have reviewed the documents before the WG chairs can advance the document.

This is a call for 5 members of the WG to read and review each of
these documents.

        thanks
        Olafur

At 23:48 17/10/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote:

> This message starts a 2 week Working Group Last call ending on
> November 1, for the two following documents:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt
>
> These two documents replace older RFC's to reflect the fact DSA and
> Diffie-Hellman keying information is encoded the same way in KEY and
> DNSKEY RR's (and other DNS RR types).
> The documents contain few minor textual changes from the RFC's they are
> replacing, including references to the DNSSEC-bis documents.
>
> These documents are on standards track and will be recycled at
> proposed standard, to be at the same level as DNSSEC-bis.
>
> The default action is to advance these documents, if you find any
> issues with the documents please raise them now.
>
>         Olafur & Olaf
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>