Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis

[Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>]

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt

	Section 2 you dropped the description of the first 4 octets of the
	KEY record but you left them in the diagram.  I would suggest that
	they be removed from the diagram.
 

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt

	Both need a section describing the change from the RFC's they
	are obsoleting.

	Something stating that it doesn't change the wire format of KEY
	RR's it mearly extends the use to also cover DNSKEY.

--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>