Mail Thread Index
- Remarks on opt-in-09, was Re: Remarks on draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly,
Mike StJohns
- Publication request raft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-05,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Publication request draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-04,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Remarks on draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly,
Andrew Sullivan
- additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt,
Roy Arends
- DNSv2 comment in Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Edward Lewis
- Noah's principle,
Roy Arends
- Re: 2929bis RRTYPE Allocation for the ENUM Branch Location Record,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- 2929bis RRTYPE Allocation for the ENUM Branch Location Record,
Otmar Lendl
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- DNSEXT IETF-67 meeting minutes,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- SO vs DNSSEC,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- An argument from a contrarian point of view (was: Pimping DNSSEC),
Andrew Sullivan
- brain cycles of the WG,
Pekka Savola
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Edward Lewis
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
bert hubert
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Pekka Savola
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Edward Lewis
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Pekka Savola
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Edward Lewis
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Pekka Savola
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Edward Lewis
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Florian Weimer
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Jim Reid
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Paul Vixie
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Ben Laurie
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Edward Lewis
- Re: brain cycles of the WG,
Jay Daley
- peace,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
bert hubert
- Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Shane Kerr
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
bert hubert
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Edward Lewis
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Paul Vixie
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
bmanning
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
bert hubert
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Alex Bligh
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Masataka Ohta
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
bert hubert
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Alex Bligh
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Alex Bligh
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Joe Abley
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Alex Bligh
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Mark Andrews
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Danny Mayer
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Ralph Droms
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Ted Lemon
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Ralph Droms
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.),
Danny Mayer
- Back to Ohta's old proposal (Was: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Trustworthiness rules,
Andreas Gustafsson
- DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Josh Littlefield
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Florian Weimer
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Ralph Droms
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
bert hubert
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Robert Story
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Robert Story
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
bert hubert
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
bert hubert
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
David Blacka
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
bert hubert
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
David Blacka
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Ben Laurie
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Ralph Droms
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Christian Huitema
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
bert hubert
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
bert hubert
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Christian Huitema
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Masataka Ohta
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Masataka Ohta
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
bert hubert
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Shane Kerr
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Ted Hardie
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Peter Koch
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Ted Hardie
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Shane Kerr
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Shane Kerr
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence,
Mike StJohns
- DNSSEC - Off-tree signatures,
Mike StJohns
- DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Mike StJohns
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Scott Rose
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Robert Story
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Mike StJohns
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?,
Rob Austein
- DNSSEC-lite - thoughts,
Mike StJohns
- Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Dave Crocker
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Edward Lewis
- RE: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Tony Finch
- RE: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- DNSEXT WGLC Summary: RFC2929bis,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Wrap-up trustupdate timers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Wrap-up rollover requirements,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- dnsext-relax-gratuitous-tsig,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Relaxing Gratuitous TSIG Requirement comments,
Brian Wellington
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis - templates and guidelines,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- New working group document ?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- NSEC3 and dynamic update issues.,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Fwd: note the boilerplate change,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- comments on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt,
Edward Lewis
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-01.txt,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit,
Wouter Wijngaards
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-08.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- DDNS-DHCP RFCs,
Ralph Droms
- RFC 4701 on A DNS Resource Record (RR) for Encoding Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Information (DHCID RR),
rfc-editor
- IETF-57 draft agenda has been posted,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-08.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-08.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: FYI: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly-00.txt,
Paul Vixie
- Fwd: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv),
Olaf M. Kolkman
- FYI: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly-00.txt,
Mike StJohns
- comments on trustupdate-timers-04,
Lindy Foster
- DNAME [4.14]: Small Corner Cases,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.13]: PTR Records and DNAME,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.12]: NSEC3 and DNAME,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.11]: Wildcarded DNAME,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.10]: Synthesized CNAME TTL=0,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.9]: Name Compression in RDATA,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.8]: DNAME and CIDR Blocks in in-addr.arpa,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.7]: A DNAME is not a Zone-cut,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.6]: Signaling of DNAME Understanding,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.5]: DNSSEC,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.4]: MX and NS Records Require that the DNAME in their RDATA is Canonical,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.3]: DNAME is Always Included in Outgoing Packets.,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.2]: DNAME Apex is not Redirected Itself,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool,
Wouter Wijngaards
- DNAME update draft,
Wouter Wijngaards
- NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
David Blacka
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Roy Arends
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
David Blacka
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Hilarie Orman
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Alex Bligh
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
David Blacka
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Alex Bligh
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Roy Arends
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Alex Bligh
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.,
Edward Lewis
- draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt,
Lindy Foster
- more ambiguity (was Re: LOC),
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: LOC,
Mark Andrews
- 2nd NSEC3 workshop draft report,
Scott Rose
- humid IPv6 addresses,
Pars Mutaf
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- WGLC on trustudpate-timers,
dr. W.C.A. Wijngaards
- WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Scott Rose
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Edward Lewis
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
David Conrad
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Edward Lewis
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
char sample
- RE: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Griffin, Wesley
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
char sample
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Paul Vixie
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Mike StJohns
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Mike StJohns
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Robert Story
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers,
Mike StJohns
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- RFC 4471 on Derivation of DNS Name Predecessor and Successor,
rfc-editor
- DNSEXT call for agenda items,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: [dnsop] Re: [dnssec-deployment] BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue,
Ben Laurie
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue,
Thierry Moreau
- BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue,
Ben Laurie
- nsec3 and update,
Mark Andrews
- NSEC3PARAMS and UPDATE,
Mark Andrews
- Re: leading zeros, odd digit counts in salt,
Mark Andrews
- RFC 4635 on HMAC SHA (Hashed Message Authentication Code, Secure Hash Algorithm) TSIG Algorithm Identifiers,
rfc-editor
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Last Call: 'DNSSEC Opt-In' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in),
The IESG
- Last Call: 'DNSSEC Experiments' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments),
The IESG
- draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-07,
Roy Arends
- NSEC3, UPDATE and adding/removing a zone cut,
Mark Andrews
- UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.,
Mark Andrews
- NSEC3 Issue 9, update,
David Blacka
- NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes,
Roy Arends
- NSEC3 Issue 19, revisited.,
David Blacka
- NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
David Blacka
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
David Blacka
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
David Blacka
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
David Blacka
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.,
Mark Andrews
- nsec3 and unknown hash algorithms,
Mark Andrews
- closest provable encloser vs closest encloser,
Mark Andrews
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-47.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.),
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.),
Eric Rescorla
- Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.),
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- CLASS, was RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Edward Lewis
- draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-06,
Mark Andrews
- updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
bert hubert
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Mark Andrews
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
David Blacka
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Mark Andrews
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
David Blacka
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Eric Rescorla
- RE: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Ben Laurie
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Eric Rescorla
- RE: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations,
Mark Andrews
- Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Matt Larson
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Rob Austein
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
bert hubert
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Alex Bligh
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Roy Arends
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Edward Lewis
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
bert hubert
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Larson, Matt
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Chris Thompson
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Edward Lewis
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
David Blacka
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
David Blacka
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Paul Vixie
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Alex Bligh
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Alex Bligh
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Roy Arends
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Mark Andrews
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Eric Rescorla
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
David Blacka
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.,
Edward Lewis
- draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-03 - Last Pass,
Mike StJohns
- Namedroppers moderation announcement,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- nsec3,
Mark Andrews
- RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
bert hubert
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
Paul Vixie
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
bert hubert
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
Robert Story
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
Kevin Darcy
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
bert hubert
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
bert hubert
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
Scott Rose
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Minimalist TAK automated rollover procedure in DNS resolver,
Thierry Moreau
- OASIS and new RR types,
Anders Rundgren
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
David Conrad
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
Douglas Otis
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
Mark Andrews
- RE: OASIS and new RR types,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
Mark Andrews
- RE: OASIS and new RR types,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
Douglas Otis
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
bert hubert
- Re: OASIS and new RR types,
Douglas Otis
- RE: OASIS and new RR types,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- test,
Roger Yerbanga
- DNSEXT66 minutes,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Bad handling of DNS responses over TCP.,
Mark Andrews
- superwildcards poc code.,
Roy Arends
- Comments on dr,
Eric Rescorla
- DNS zone file format (Was: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- timers draft and parent DS records,
Robert Story
- Notes on DNSSEC key rollover,
Eric Rescorla
- 3 comments on timers-03,
Scott Rose
- pushing the limits of DNS Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Edward Lewis
- RFC 4592 on The Role of Wildcards in the Domain Name System,
rfc-editor
- a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Edward Lewis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Roy Arends
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Paul Vixie
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Roy Arends
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Mark Andrews
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Mark Andrews
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Mark Andrews
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Doug Barton
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Julian Mehnle
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Mark Andrews
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Edward Lewis
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Douglas Otis
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Doug Barton
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
David Blacka
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Doug Barton
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Doug Barton
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Douglas Otis
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Kevin Darcy
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Douglas Otis
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
william(at)elan.net
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
william(at)elan.net
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
william(at)elan.net
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
william(at)elan.net
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Douglas Otis
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Douglas Otis
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards,
Douglas Otis
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Peter Koch
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Scott Rose
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Thierry Moreau
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Måns Nilsson
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Edward Lewis
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
bmanning
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Edward Lewis
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Edward Lewis
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Ted Hardie
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Edward Lewis
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Sam Weiler
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Sam Weiler
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Thomas Narten
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Sam Weiler
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
bmanning
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Thomas Narten
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Thomas Narten
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Sam Weiler
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
bmanning
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Peter Koch
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Simon Josefsson
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis,
Peter Koch
- 2nd NSEC3 workshop, 18-20 September 2006,
Roy Arends
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: clarification...Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Rob Austein
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Frederico A C Neves
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Gustavo Lozano
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
albertof_mtzherrera
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Kenji Rikitake
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
bmanning
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward,
Roy Arends
- DNSEXT WGLC Summary: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- DNSEXT action items from IETF-66 meeting,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- comments on rollover-requirements-02,
Wes Hardaker
- Draft: updated milestones,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: [nsec3-testing] NSEC3 Meeting at IETF 66,
geoff
- Clarifications about status of TAKREM proposal for automated TAK rollover,
Thierry Moreau
- Do any DNSEXT participants care about TAK rollover security?,
Thierry Moreau
- [Re: Applications/API meeting during IETF-66],
bmanning
- Last Call: 'DNS Name Server Identifier Option (NSID)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid) (fwd),
Dean Anderson
- DNSEXT WGLC: Evaluating DNSSEC Transition Mechanisms,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- DNSEXT-66 Agenda,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Sam Weiler
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Roy Arends
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
David Blacka
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Roy Arends
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
David Blacka
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
David Blacka
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
David Blacka
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
David Blacka
- RE: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Edward Lewis
- RE: Advance request for opt-in and experiments,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Problems in DDNS Client Development for Secure Update,
Badrinath . S
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trans-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- An out-of-scope analysis of in-scope TAK rollover proposals,
Thierry Moreau
- Is keyrollover neccesary? (was Key rollover Work.),
Gustavo Lozano
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: nsid last call (fwd),
Dean Anderson
- Re: Your version of M-of-N (was Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.),
Paul Vixie
- Trust anchor rollover review,
dr. W.C.A. Wijngaards
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
bmanning
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Sam Weiler
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Robert Story
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Sam Weiler
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Sam Weiler
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Sam Weiler
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Wouter Wijngaards
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Wesley Griffin
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Gustavo Lozano
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: Recall: Key rollover Work.,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- RE: You saw this, right? / Cookies/ RE: stopping amplification,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: You saw this, right?,
Bill Woodcock
- Re: Key rollover work, was Re: RFC2672bis DNAME update document,
Gustavo Lozano
- DNAME question,
Edward Lewis
- draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Kenji Rikitake
- RE: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Kenji Rikitake
- RE: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
John Kristoff
- RE: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
John Kristoff
- Re: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Roy Arends
- Re: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Suranjith Ariyapperuma
- Re: draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-00.txt,
Roy Arends
- Fwd: Last Call: 'DNS Name Server Identifier Option (NSID)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid),
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Last Call: 'DNS Name Server Identifier Option (NSID)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid),
The IESG
- NSEC3 - proposed mods to draft,
David A. Wheeler
- NSEC3 Issue 22: Defining new hash algorithms.,
David Blacka
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in-09.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- NSEC3 and the future,
David A. Wheeler
- usage of Server Failure Response code,
Hyo-Jeong Shin
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 10: Potential DoS on Servers, and partial resolution: separate queue for not-found,
David A. Wheeler
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 10: Potential DoS on Servers,,
David A. Wheeler
- NSEC3 nit,
David A. Wheeler
- draft-austein-dnsext-relax-gratuitous-tsig-00.txt,
Rob Austein
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-signed-nonexistence-requirements-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- DNAME questions,
David Blacka
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNAME questions,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNAME questions,
Matt Larson
- Re: DNAME questions,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNAME questions,
David Blacka
- Re: DNAME questions,
bmanning
- Re: DNAME questions,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNAME questions,
David Blacka
- Re: DNAME questions,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNAME questions,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNAME questions,
David Blacka
- Re: DNAME questions,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNAME questions,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNAME questions,
David Blacka
- Re: DNAME questions,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNAME questions,
David Blacka
- Re: DNAME questions,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNAME questions,
David Blacka
- Re: DNAME questions,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNAME questions,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNAME questions,
Klaus Malorny
- A look at draft-...nsid-01.txt,
Edward Lewis
- Key rollover work, was Re: RFC2672bis DNAME update document,
Olaf M . Kolkman
- Re: nsid last call,
Olaf M . Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: nsid last call,
Peter Koch
- Re: nsid last call,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: nsid last call,
Edward Lewis
- Re: nsid last call,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: nsid last call,
Edward Lewis
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Alex Bligh
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Alex Bligh
- Re: nsid last call,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: nsid last call,
Edward Lewis
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Alex Bligh
- Re: nsid last call,
Peter Koch
- Re: nsid last call,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: nsid last call,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: nsid last call,
Edward Lewis
- Re: nsid last call,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: nsid last call,
jad
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Matt Larson
- Re: nsid last call,
Alex Bligh
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
geoff
- Re: nsid last call,
Alex Bligh
- Re: nsid last call,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: nsid last call,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: nsid last call,
Alex Bligh
- Re: nsid last call,
Edward Lewis
- Re: nsid last call,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: nsid last call,
Dean Anderson
- Re: RFC2672bis DNAME update document,
Mark Andrews
- ISSUE 10: Use of RFC 2119 terminology, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-01,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Issue 9: Relevance to working group charter, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-01,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 8: Wording of existing requirements, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-01,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 6: draft-moreau-dnsext-tak-req-00 has other useful requirements, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-01,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-01,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- RFC2672bis DNAME update document,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- DNSEXT @ IETF-66 agenda items,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- NSEC3 Issue 19: NSEC3 processing order,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- NSEC3 Issue 21: Signer behavior in case of hash collision.,
Roy Arends
- NSEC3 Issue 20: Server behavior wrt unknown hash algorithms,
Roy Arends
- NSEC3 Issue 18: signalling complete NSEC3 chains,
Roy Arends
- NSEC3 Issue 17: opt-out for delegation only is not enforcable.,
Roy Arends
- NSEC3 Issue 16: The need for a Hash Length Field.,
Roy Arends
- NSEC3 Issue 15: recommend against the use of partially opt-out zones.,
Roy Arends
- draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid issues to be reviewed,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Fwd: Internet-Drafts Submission Cutoff Dates for the 66th IETF Meeting in Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- some issues with NSEC3, based on the workshop last week,
Edward Lewis
- NSEC3 Dynamic Update (proposed),
Ben Laurie
- comments on rollover requirements,
Edward Lewis
- Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Ben Laurie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Sam Weiler
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- RE: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- RE: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Alex Bligh
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Roy Arends
- RE: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Roy Arends
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
bert hubert
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Roy Arends
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Roy Arends
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Edward Lewis
- RE: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
bert hubert
- RE: Proposed NSEC/NSEC3 transition mechanism,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RR Type allocation for infrastructure ENUM BLR/EBL record,
Otmar Lendl
- SOA records in negative responses,
Roy Arends
- RFC 4509 on Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs),
rfc-editor
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Russ Mundy
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Francis Dupont
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Rob Austein
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Mike StJohns
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- RE: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Hilarie Orman
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Dean Anderson
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Simon Josefsson
- RE: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Loomis, Rip
- RE: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Jelte Jansen
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Mike StJohns
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Mark Feldman
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Chris Thompson
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ben Laurie
- RE: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-ecc-key-09.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- RFC 4470 on Minimally Covering NSEC Records and DNSSEC On-line Signing,
rfc-editor
- PowerDNS recursor algorithm review,
bert hubert
- NSEC3 draft comments,
Edward Lewis
- Re: proving NAME ERROR (was: Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name),
Edward Lewis
- Draft minutes posted,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- proving NAME ERROR (was: Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name),
Roy Arends
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-46.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
paul
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Rob Austein
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Roy Arends
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Roy Arends
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Rob Austein
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Roy Arends
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Rob Austein
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Edward Lewis
- Re: [dns-operations] NXDOMAIN vs NODATA for suffixes of existing name,
Rob Austein
- isc dlv spec published,
Paul Vixie
- heads up: some practical DNS real life things you might want to know,
bert hubert
- Nomination of O.Kolkman at the IAB - good news for advances in DNS technology,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: ISSUE 4: Key "lifetimes", was Re: Pending issues for draft-i etf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Thierry Moreau
- draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt,
Sam Weiler
- RE: ISSUE 4: Key "lifetimes", was Re: Pending issues for draft-i etf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Loomis, Rip
- New DSA key sizes RE: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- should a pure recursor know about localhost/1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa?,
bert hubert
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- ISSUE 8: Wording in existing requirements, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: ISSUE 7: New requirements, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Mike StJohns
- Re: ISSUE 4: Key "lifetimes", was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Mike StJohns
- Re: ISSUE 2: Mandatory to Implement, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Mike StJohns
- ISSUE 7: New requirements, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 6: Requirements in draft-moreau-dnsext-tak-req-00, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 5: Embedded requirements, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 4: Key "lifetimes", was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 3: presentation flaws, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 2: Mandatory to Implement, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- ISSUE 1: IPR, was Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: Automatic key verification / CERT in DNS / RFC4398 (Was: [Announce] GnuPG 1.4.3 released),
Paul Vixie
- Re: Automatic key verification / CERT in DNS / RFC4398 (Was: [Announce] GnuPG 1.4.3 released),
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: Automatic key verification / CERT in DNS / RFC4398 (Was: [Announce] GnuPG 1.4.3 released),
Jeroen Massar
- Re: Automatic key verification / CERT in DNS / RFC4398,
Julian Mehnle
- Automatic key verification / CERT in DNS / RFC4398 (Was: [Announce] GnuPG 1.4.3 released),
Jeroen Massar
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Paul Vixie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Emilio Perea
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
bert hubert
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Josh Littlefield
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
bert hubert
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Ketil Froyn
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Florian Weimer
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
bert hubert
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
David Blacka
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Ketil Froyn
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
bert hubert
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Chris Thompson
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Edward Lewis
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Edward Lewis
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
bert hubert
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: another out-of-zone cname question-- anti-aliasing of zone servers?,
Paul Vixie
- another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Paul Vixie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Josh Littlefield
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Alan Barrett
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
bert hubert
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Florian Weimer
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Edward Lewis
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Mark Andrews
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Edward Lewis
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Paul Vixie
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Edward Lewis
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Mark Andrews
- Re: another question about interpretation of the scriptures: cname chains,
Edward Lewis
- RFC 4398 on Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS),
rfc-editor
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-07.txt & draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-07.txt,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Continuing the work on key-rollover,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- upon reflection, was Re: stopping amplification,
Edward Lewis
- ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
bert hubert
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Edward Lewis
- RE: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Everhart, Craig
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
bert hubert
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Edward Lewis
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Kevin Darcy
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
bert hubert
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Josh Littlefield
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Edward Lewis
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
bert hubert
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Mark Andrews
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Paul Vixie
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
Kevin Darcy
- Re: ANY queries, recursing nameserver?,
bert hubert
- moving on from:? Re: stopping amplification,
Edward Lewis
- Protocol Action: 'The Role of Wildcards in the Domain Name System' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
- stopping amplification,
Edward Lewis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: stopping amplification,
bmanning
- Re: stopping amplification,
bert hubert
- Re: stopping amplification,
Paul Vixie
- Re: stopping amplification,
Edward Lewis
- RE: stopping amplification,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: stopping amplification,
Robert Story
- RE: stopping amplification,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: stopping amplification,
Roy Arends
- Re: stopping amplification,
bert hubert
- Re: stopping amplification,
Peter Koch
- Re: stopping amplification,
Roy Arends
- Re: stopping amplification,
Mark Andrews
- Re: stopping amplification,
Roy Arends
- Re: stopping amplification,
Peter Koch
- Re: stopping amplification,
Roy Arends
- Re: stopping amplification,
Ben Laurie
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Proposal, DSA 2048 with 256 bit subgroup,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- comments on dnssec-experiments,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Usefulness of ECC-DSA algorithm for DNSSEC,
Mike StJohns
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dhcid-rr-13.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-wcard-clarify-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- DH/DSA I-Ds,
Ben Laurie
- DSA and D-H I-Ds?,
Ben Laurie
- draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt,
Mike StJohns
- draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt review,
Mike StJohns
- draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06,
Michael Richardson
- draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256 security considerations,
Rob Austein
- test event report,
Yukiyo Akisada
- Re: RE-ISSUE 1: 5.6,
Brett Carr
- RE-ISSUE 1: 5.6,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in-08,
Geoffrey Sisson
- NSD patches available,
Ben Laurie
- Publication Request: LLMNR-45 to Informational,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Proposed RFC 2538bis AUTH48 problem resolution,
Simon Josefsson
- Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- RE: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Brett Carr
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Tony Finch
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
bert hubert
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Chris Thompson
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Jim Reid
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Jeroen Massar
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Sean Leach
- RE: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Loomis, Rip
- RE: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Edward Lewis
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: Secure DNS is just weakly secure,
Masataka Ohta
- ISSUE 2: Mandatory to implement,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Draft agenda,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- comments on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in-08,
Andrew Sullivan
- review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-02,
Andrew Sullivan
- NSEC3 Pre-Workshop Report,
Geoffrey Sisson
- Protocol Action: 'HMAC SHA TSIG Algorithm Identifiers' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- MUST vs SHOULD for trust anchor rollover, nameserver side,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Mike StJohns
- Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Roy Arends
- RE: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Scott Rose
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Mark Kosters
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Sam Weiler
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Thomas Narten
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
David Blacka
- RE: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Scott Rose
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Rodney Joffe
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
David Blacka
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
David Blacka
- Re: Reminder: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Sam Weiler
- DNSSEC Validator API,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR , response #2,
Edward Lewis
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Damien Miller
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Damien Miller
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thomas Narten
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Edward Lewis
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Ted Lemon
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Russ Mundy
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Edward Lewis
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
bmanning
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Edward Lewis
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Rob Austein
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Robert Story
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Ted Lemon
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Thomas Narten
- <Possible follow-ups>
- DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Mark Andrews
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Rob Austein
- Re: DLV now an informational section of DNS protocol suite, plus the TA RR as a bonus,
Mark Andrews
- Protocol Action: 'Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
- Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Ted Lemon
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Hilarie Orman
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Alex Bligh
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
bmanning
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Ted Lemon
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Matt Larson
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Ted Lemon
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Paul Vixie
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft,
Suresh Krishnaswamy
- DNSSEC is almost worthless!,
Thierry Moreau
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dhcid-rr-12.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- DNS conformance tester version 1.0 is available,
Yukiyo Akisada
- Updated draft - draft-ietf-dnsext-dhcid-rr-12.txt,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- NSEC3 Workshop - 8-10 May,
Geoffrey Sisson
- IETF-65 DNSEXT agenda items,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Mark Stapp
- WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Matt Larson
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
bmanning
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Sam Weiler
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Sam Weiler
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
David Blacka
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Sam Weiler
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Sam Weiler
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
David Blacka
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
David Blacka
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Sam Weiler
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
David Blacka
- Re: WGLC dnssec-experiments and dnssec-opt-in,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Simon Josefsson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Alex Bligh
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Paul Vixie
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Alex Bligh
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Alex Bligh
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Paul Vixie
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Alex Bligh
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Alex Bligh
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt 5.2,
Paul Vixie
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN,DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dhcid-rr-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Russ Mundy
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Scott Rose
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Ben Laurie
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Geoffrey Sisson
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Russ Mundy
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Russ Mundy
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Thierry Moreau
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Mike StJohns
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Paul Vixie
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Ben Laurie
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Hilarie Orman
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Ben Laurie
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00.txt,
Scott Rose
- NSEC3 issue: DNSSEC is too complex by half already,
bert hubert
- NSEC3 Issue 13: DDNS and Opt-In Determination,
Geoffrey Sisson
- NSEC3 Issue 10: Potential DoS on Servers,
Geoffrey Sisson
- NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Geoffrey Sisson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Alex Bligh
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Geoffrey Sisson
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Ben Laurie
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Geoffrey Sisson
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Alex Bligh
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Sam Weiler
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Ben Laurie
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Ben Laurie
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Sam Weiler
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Ben Laurie
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Sam Weiler
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Ben Laurie
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
David Blacka
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Sam Weiler
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Sam Weiler
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers,
Ben Laurie
- NSEC3 Issue 8: NSEC3 Signaling Mechanism,
Geoffrey Sisson
- NSEC3 Resolved Issues,
Geoffrey Sisson
- NSEC3 Issues,
Geoffrey Sisson
- DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Peter Koch
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
David Blacka
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Sam Weiler
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
David Conrad
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Peter Koch
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSSECbis clarifications: QTYPE ANY & "DNSSEC RRSets",
Mike StJohns
- LLMNR consensus statement,
Ólafur Guðmundsson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Stuart Cheshire
- RE: LLMNR consensus statement,
Durand, Alain
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Stuart Cheshire
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: LLMNR consensus statement,
Wes Hardaker
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- A least a draft now exists for trust anchor key rollover requirements.,
Thierry Moreau
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DDNS IESG Issue resolution.,
David W. Hankins
- Re: DDNS IESG Issue resolution.,
Ted Lemon
- Limiting recursion...was Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Edward Lewis
- FW: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SH A)' to Informational RFC,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- Re: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
David W. Hankins
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- Re: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- Re: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Sam Hartman
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- Re: [dhcwg] Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Sam Hartman
- the RD bit is troubling me today,
Paul Vixie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Peter Koch
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Paul Vixie
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Paul Vixie
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Paul V. Mockapetris
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Edward Lewis
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Paul Vixie
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Paul Vixie
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Edward Lewis
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Edward Lewis
- Re: the RD bit is troubling me today,
Florian Weimer
- Implementation work done on DNSSEC trust anchor key rollover solution,
Thierry Moreau
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: UTF-8 issues (Re: Open issues in DHCP FQDN,DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs),
Bernie Volz \(volz\)
- UTF-8 issues (Re: Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Open issues in DHCP FQDN, DHCID and DDNS-DHCP Related RFCs,
Ralph Droms
- [question]What is an accurate meaning of "client" in RFC2181?,
Hideshi Enokihara
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-sha-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Last Call: 'Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
- Protocol Action: 'Minimally Covering NSEC Records and DNSSEC On-line Signing' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
- RFC 2538bis security problem with the indirect types,
Simon Josefsson
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- DNSEXT publication request: DS SHA-256,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Request to publish draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- Even newer version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Samuel Weiler
- Re: Trust Anchor Key management issue, stalled or slow progress?,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- WG LC results summary: draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-03.txt,
Wes Hardaker
- [Reminder IETF 65 Dallas],
bmanning
- DNSEXT document status and actions 200601,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsid-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- IANA considerations in RFC 2538bis,
Simon Josefsson
- DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Edward Lewis
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Paul Vixie
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
bmanning
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Tony Finch
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Eric A. Hall
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Dave Thaler
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Eric A. Hall
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Bernard Aboba
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Eric A. Hall
- Re: DNSEXT Document Review: LLMNR-45,
Eric A. Hall
- RFC 4343 on Domain Name System (DNS) Case Insensitivity Clarification,
rfc-editor
- NSEC3 Testing Mailing List,
Geoffrey Sisson
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Olaf M. Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Scott Rose
- Re: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Edward Lewis
- Re: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
David Blacka
- Re: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Edward Lewis
- Re: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Samuel Weiler
- Re: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Edward Lewis
- Re: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Ted Hardie
- RE: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Samuel Weiler
- RE: New version of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing,
Scott Rose
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-wcard-clarify-10.txt,
Kevin Darcy
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-wcard-clarify-10.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-online-signing-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Fwd: RFC 4255,
Edward Lewis
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DS SHA-256,
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
- DNSEXT list policy,
Olaf Kolkman
Mail converted by MHonArc