[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNSEXT future

I am not a fan of WG living forever.

I think a WG in search of recharter after so long is a WG which needs to
be considered a strong candidate for closure, especially if docs in
review are now not there.

If there is a need for a DNS wg, it should come in "at the top".

I think this for two reasons:

	firstly, its better for IETF process its done this way.

	secondly, it will allow for a better charter/focus to emerge.

so you can add me +1 on the closure side.

-George


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>