Re: DNSEXT future

[Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>]

At 21:55 26/03/2007, Edward Lewis wrote:

> What about DNAME?  That's the only topic that caused any stir of 
> engineering at the meeting last week.

I omitted from my summary that we have 2 active working group documents[A]
both of which the chairs intent to force the working group to
finish in the next few months, and advance them to IESG by Jun. 15'th.

There are also number of documents at the IESG that need to be processed.
Rechartering takes minimum 1-2 months so the WG, chairs and AD needs some
lead time on that one, thus the question now.

Each one of the options presented has different point of execution,
killing the WG is the one that will take longest (i.e. after IESG approves
the last document). Keep the group around is shortest, going sleep is in
the middle.

The purpose of this message is an open question to the WG are we done
mucking with DNS and DNSSEC?

        Olafur

[A] Read and comment on ASAP:
http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-01.txt
http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience-00.txt


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>