Re: NSEC3, version 13

[ted@NLnetLabs.nl (Ted Lindgreen)]

[Quoting Sam Hartman, on Nov 30, 17:34, in "Re: NSEC3, version 1 ..."]

> However, since there are objections, I assume the chairs will also
> call for support;silence in the presence of objections is not rough
> consensus.

I share Sam's concern, I also think that silence does not suffice
to go forward.

NSEC3 is a very complicated protocol extention. Few people, even
in this WG, really understand the issues at hand, those who do,
should speak up and guarantee the rest of us that all issues are
now solved,

Regards,
-- ted

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>