At 15:19 -0800 12/31/07, Noah Treuhaft wrote:
I think it's reasonable for a responder who does not understand the OPT pseudo-RR to ignore it and respond as though the OPT were absent from the request. As the above paragraph stands, that's unexpected behavior. Is there any reason it should be?
Maybe my recollection is hazy, but I think the theory is that any responder that does not understand the OPT pseudo-RR would barf when seeing a record in the additional section in a query.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Think glocally. Act confused. -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>