[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/

To: "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/
From: Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:24:16 -0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
In-reply-to: <200811252258.mAPMvwdJ013553@drugs.dv.isc.org>

On 11/25/08 2:57 PM, "Mark Andrews" <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe expand it to NINFO?
>>
>> Sure. Whatever. :-)
>
>         And with ICANN's plans to expand the root we may well see
>         NINFO as a TLD.

Is there any strong justification for reserving RR types against being TLDs
(or vice versa)? If so, now would be a rather good time to discuss it before
any future TLD policy is crystalised.

kim

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Follow-Ups:
- [dnsext] Re: s/ZS/NI/
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/
  - From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>

References:
- Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/
  - From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/
Next by Date: Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/
Previous by thread: Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/
Next by thread: Re: [dnsext] s/ZS/NI/
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread