[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dnsext] errata 4034 - 5011
- To: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Subject: Re: [dnsext] errata 4034 - 5011
- From: "Roy Arends" <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:10:11 +0100
- Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
- Domainkey-signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc: Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:Message-ID:From:Date: X-MIMETrack:Content-Type; b=DEJ3dO66eyKGXqGHyrsRIbB5I3Kx1X/xufN13X78Opw+Z8WgPdRxOMGx 9bPDDRzjWPtIZG3FGLglKVDEcJV3GE1DTIInJ+dk/uLffkwqauNdnhHmU mmz70ucbt/ges6i;
- In-reply-to: <4937B2ED.4030309@nlnetlabs.nl>
- References: <4937B2ED.4030309@nlnetlabs.nl>
Matthijs Mekking wrote on 12/04/2008 11:37:33 AM:
> I was notified about the fact that 5011 does not update 4034,
That is correct.
> and vice versa.
It is hard to write a document that updates future publications
preemptively, so we decided to leave it out when writing rfc4034. :-)
> Because of the description of the REVOKED bit, I believe it
> should. That's why I would like to report two editorial erratas, one for
> 4034, one for 5011.
What should be updated? Can you suggest text? IMHO the document does not
need to be updated solely on the assignment of new flags by IANA.
Regards,
Roy Arends
Sr. Researcher
Nominet UK
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>