[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: implied NSEC3 support in rsasha256 (was: [dnsext] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-05)



	Which unfortunately sets a precident.  People won't go back
	and look at this discussion.  We need to send the right message,
	in rfc's, for people adding new algorithms.

Which Andrew has proposed doing in dnssec-bis-updates. Is that not sufficient?

-- Sam

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>