In message <a06240805c58007f1dd48@[0.0.0.0]>, Edward Lewis writes:
Yesterday I assembled a pile of notes, printed messages relating to
the topic and got all set to start editing it this morning. Yep,
left all the paper at work.
I addressed most of the topics I could recall. If I left one out,
which I'll look for when I get back to the pile of paper, I'll add it
sooner or later.
I'm crossing my fingers regarding the new automated ID submission
process. Still have my doubts about technology.
One open question...raised by Alfred...
What is done about old servers that put one RR per message into AXFR
responses? How does this play with the words about complete RR sets?
The answer is the set of messages which make up the AXFR
response. As long as the set of messages contains the
complete RRset there is no problem.
>(15) Section 3.1
>
>I have not seen precise answers to my question regarding
>the granularity of responses (old AXFR servers sending only one RR
>per AXFR response message violate the principle of only putting
>entire RRsets into DNS response messages).
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468
Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>